Author Archives: MFA

  • 0

[Research] Access to Justice for Migrant Domestic Workers in Lebanon

The ILO and Caritas Lebanon Migrant Center have conducted an ambitious research to better understand the barriers to access to justice faced by migrant domestic workers in Lebanon.


  • 0

New ILO Protocol on Forced Labour

Category : News

Dear Friends,

Hope all goes well. We are glad to inform you that on 11 June 2014, the International Labour Conference adopted a legally binding Protocol on Forced Labour which aims to advance prevention, protection and compensation measures as well as to intensify efforts to combat contemporary forms of slavery. Please see details below.Gill_Button_Raise_awareness_FL_800x600_facc12a89bb8

Migrant Forum in Asia who has been part of the process welcomes this historical milestone as it signals a strong political commitment to end forced labour. May this commitment be soon put into practice and that governments move quickly to ratify and enforce the Protocol.

Our thanks to our members and partners who have contributed to this success.

Courage, Peace, Power in a life full of meaning,

William Gois
Regional Coordinator
Migrant Forum in Asia

———————————–

ILO adopts new Protocol to tackle modern forms of forced labour

On June 11, 2014, the International Labour Conference has adopted a new legally binding ILO Protocol on Forced Labour, aiming to advance prevention, protection and compensation measures, as well as to intensify efforts to eliminate contemporary forms of slavery.

The Protocol, supported by a Recommendation, was adopted by government, employer and worker delegates to the International Labour Conference (ILC) with 437 votes for 27 abstentions and 8 against.

“The Protocol and Recommendation mark a major step forward in the fight against forced labour and represent a firm commitment among governments, employer and worker organizations to eliminate contemporary forms of slavery,” Guy Ryder, ILO Director-General said.

The text of the Protocol and the Recommendation are available in the report of the Committee.

For more information, click here.


  • 0

[Report] Migrant Workers’ Access to Justice at Home: Nepal

migrant-workers-access-justice-home-nepal-featured-20140610Open Society Foundations launched a study in Kathmandu with the Centre for Labour and Mobility entitled Migrant Workers’ Access to Justice at Home: Nepal. This is the second in a series of studies OSF commissioned on accountability in recruitment and access to legal remedies for migrant workers in their home countries.

Read more here


  • 0

Regional Workshop on Ethical Business and Recruitment Practices in Labour Migration in the Middle-East, North Africa and Asia

On 1-4 May 2014 in Dubai, the UAE, MFA held a lawyers’ caucus as a major part of the Regional Workshop on Ethical Business and Recruitment Practices in Labour Migration in the Middle-East, North Africa and Asia. This was a training program for practitioners held in partnership with Migrant Forum in Asia, the Middle East Centre for Training and Development and the Diplomacy Training Program (DTP).

Thirty-two participants from 13 countries , including 10 lawyers from countries of origin in South Asia and Southeast Asia and countries of destination in West Asia, together with social workers, members of civil society, nationaluman rights institutions and private agencies, deliberated for four days on highly significant topics:

  • The right to access remedy – for migrant workers
  • Accountability and Access to Remedy – What remedy and redress mechanisms exist – and can be accessed by migrant workers; What access to remedy is offered by OECD Guidelines – Industry Standards and Codes of Conduct and ILO Conventions, NHRIs, Courts
  • The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and beyond
  • The state and private sector – the Dhaka Principles, OECD Guidelines, Codes of Conduct, Litigation
  • The State Duty to Protect Human Rights and the Right to Remedy
  • Human Rights, Migrant Workers and Recruitment Agencies – Identifying the Gaps Between (Guiding) Principles and Practice
  • Key Challenges in monitoring and regulating recruitment in the private sector – Can the GPs/DPs/OECD Guidelines/Codes Help
  • The Corporate Responsibility to Respect – Key Challenges for the Recruitment Industry and Employers in Countries of Origin and Destination. Can the (Guiding/Dhaka) Principles Help
  • Engaging With Business on the Rights of Migrants – The Why and How – Practical Session with Advocates

The training program equipped the practitioners with approaches to further understanding ethical business and recruitment practices, related frameworks and how they affect the rights of migrant workers and members of their families. Through role-playing and breakout sessions, the lawyers and civil society (considered as paralegal workers) were able to do run-throughs of probable responses to rights violation cases.


  • 0

2nd Advisory Committee Meeting and Fact-Finding Mission to Malaysia of the Inter-Parliamentary Caucus on Labor Migration

PRESS STATEMENT

14-16 April 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

We, the members of the Advisory Committee of the Asian Inter-Parliamentary Caucus on Labour Migration representing fifteen countries, met on 14-16 April in Kuala Lumpur for the 2nd Advisory Committee Meeting and Fact-Finding Mission to inquire on the situation of migrant workers in Malaysia.

We consulted the Members of Parliament, Migration Working Group, Migrant Care, Malaysian Trade Union Congress, trade unions, Bar Council Malaysia, the National Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM), foreign missions and migrant leaders as part of our investigation.

We identified eighteen recommendations to promote and protect the rights of migrant workers in Malaysia which also includes the quality of life of migrant workers.

We call upon the Malaysian government to take immediate steps to implement three key recommendations below:

  1. MOUs signed between the sending countries and Malaysia should be transparent and made public. Stakeholders should be consulted in the formulation of MOUs. MOUs should stipulate minimum international labour standards, social protection and best practices in the management of migrant labour.
  2. Malaysia should move forward in concluding the draft ASEAN Framework Instrument on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers. The drafting of the Instrument is a product of Article 22 of the Cebu ASEAN Declaration on the promotion and protection of the Rights of Migrant Workers which was adopted in January 2007. The current draft should be made available to stakeholders.
  3. Malaysia should consider a government to government (G2G) approach in the recruitment of migrant workers Malaysia. This would minimize recruitment cost and exploitation of migrant workers by outsourcing companies and private recruitment agencies and labour brokers. A special government-led multi-sectoral evaluation task force should be established to analyze the impact of the current outsourcing and recruitment and management of migrant workers in the country.

We are seriously concerned with the management of migrant workers in Malaysia. Our investigation shows that migrant workers in Malaysia are highly vulnerable to exploitation and violence in an environment where their rights are not protected and promoted. In addition, migrant workers continue to face violation of labour rights including discriminatory wage practices, long hours of work, no weekly rest day, hazardous working conditions, physically and sexually abusive employers and deplorable living conditions.

Our findings indicate that migrant workers continue to live in poverty in Malaysia and in some instances worse off than they were before in their country of origin.

Existing laws are not adequately enforced to protect the rights of migrant workers. There is also lack of enforcement officers to monitor and carry out enforcement.

Migrant workers access to justice is curtailed by immigration policies. Migrant workers lose their work permit when they lodge a complaint against the employer and/or when they are fired. The migrant workers are then required to apply for a special pass at a monthly fee of MYR 100 issued at the discretion of the immigration officer. During this period, migrant workers are not allowed to work resulting in loss of income and incentive to pursue the case.

It appears that Malaysia’s present approach to the management of migrant workers victimizes the migrant worker and favours the business community and the economies of sending countries and Malaysia.

We call upon the Malaysian government to exercise strong political will in restructuring the management of migrant workers to create a win-win situation for all stakeholders.

Download a copy of the statement and the eighteen recommendations here

———————————————————

Asian Parliamentary Caucus on Labour Migration

The Asian Inter-Parliamentary Caucus on Labor Migration was formalized in 2011 in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, through a resolution of the assembled MPs that aimed to foster collaboration and encourage a pro?active role for parliamentarians in advancing the rights and welfare of migrant workers across Asia. Migrant Forum in Asia (MFA) was designated as the Secretariat that would act as the primary coordinating body for the Caucus. Since 2007, Migrant Forum in Asia (MFA) and network partners, have been facilitating a parliamentarians program aimed at identifying the role for parliamentarians on the issues of labor migration and migrants’ rights, enhancing participation of MPs in that role, and identifying key issue areas to take on. For more information on the caucus please check the website: http://asianparliamentarians.mfasia.org/


  • 0

[Video] Beyond Threads – Garment Workers in Jordan

Tamkeen produced an orientation video about Bangladeshi migrant workers in the garment sector and their rights according to Jordanian legislation.


  • 0

[Report] Breaking the Isolation: Access to Information and Media Among Migrant Domestic Workers in Jordan and Lebanon

Category : Documents

breaking-isolation-featured-20140221 Breaking the Isolation provides an assessment of how migrant domestic workers are using technology to communicate, assert their rights, and collaborate with civil society organizations and governments to improve working conditions.

Visit the Open Society Foundations website to learn more about the publication.


  • 0

Philippines: bilateral labor agreements and memorandum of understanding

Indonesia – Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of Labor and Employment of the Republic of the Philippines and the Department of Manpower and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia concerning Migrant Workers, 2003

Japan – Memorandum of Understanding between the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration and the Japan International Corporation of Welfare Services on the Deployment and Acceptance of Filipino Candidates for “Kangoshi”, Filipino Candidates for “Kaigofukushishi”, Filipino “Kangoshi” and Filipino “Kaigofukushishi” , 2009

Jordan – Memorandum of Understanding on Labor Cooperation between the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan represented by the Ministry of Labor and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines represented by the Department of Labor and Employment, 2010

Jordan – Principles and Controls for Regulating Deployment and Employment of Filipino Domestic Workers between Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan/Ministry of Labor and Government of the Republic of the Philippines/Department of Labor and Employment, 2012

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – Agreement on Domestic Worker Recruitment between the Ministry of Labor and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Department of Labor and Employment of the Republic of the Philippines, 2013

Republic of Korea – Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of Labor and Employment of the Philippines and the Ministry of Labor of the Republic of Korea on the Sending of Workers to the Republic of Korea, 2004

Republic of Korea – Memorandum of Understanding between the Ministry of Labor, Republic of Korea and the Department of Labor and Employment, Republic of the Philippines on Cooperation in the Field of Labor and Manpower and Development, 2009

Kuwait – Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the State of Kuwait on the Establishment of Bilateral Consultations, 1997

Kuwait – Memorandum of Understanding on Labor and Manpower Development between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Government of the State of Kuwait, 1997

Lao People’s Democratic Republic – Memorandum of Understanding on Technical Cooperation on Labor and Employment between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, 2005

Lebanon – Memorandum of Understanding on Labor Cooperation between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines represented by the Department of Labor and Employment and the Government of the Republic of Lebanon represented by the Ministry of Labor, 2012

Libya – Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Philippines and the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 2006

Qatar – Agreement between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Government of the State of Qatar concerning Filipino Manpower in the State of Qatar, 1997

Qatar – Additional Protocol (2008) to the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Government of the State of Qatar concerning Filipino Manpower in the State of Qatar signed on 10 March 1997

Taiwan – Memorandum of Understanding on Special Hiring Program for Taiwan between the Manila Economic and Cultural Office in Taipei and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in the Philippines, 2003

Source:

Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA). Bilateral Labor Agreements. http://www.poea.gov.ph/lmi_kiosk/labor_agreements.htm (last accessed: 23 January 2014)


  • 0

  • 0

India: bilateral labor agreements and memorandum of understanding

Bahrain –  Memorandum of Understanding between the Republic of India and the Kingdom of Bahrain on Labour and Manpower Development, 2009

Jordan – Memorandum of Understanding on Manpower between the Government of India and the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, 1988

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – Agreement on Labour Cooperation for Domestic Service Workers Recruitment between the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs of the Republic of India and the Ministry of Labour of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2014

Kuwait –  Memorandum of Understanding on Labour, Employment and Manpower Development between the Government of the State of Kuwait and the Government of the Republic of India, 2007

Malaysia – Memorandum of Understanding on the Employment of Workers between the Government of India and the Government of Malaysia, 2009

Oman – Memorandum of Understanding between the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs in the Republic of India and the Ministry of Manpower in the Sultanate of Oman in the field of Manpower, 2008

Qatar – Agreement concerning the organisation of Manpower Employment between the State of Qatar represented by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs and the Republic of India represented by the Ministry of Labour, 1985

Qatar – Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the Republic of India and the State of Qatar, 2007

United Arab Emirates (UAE) – Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the United Arab Emirates and the Government of India in the field of Manpower, 2006

Source:

Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs (MOIA). Memorandum of Understanding. http://moia.gov.in/services.aspx?ID1=349&id=m4&idp=81&mainid=73 (last accessed 28 January 2014).